Decode Digital Noise with 1 Question

🧰 Twella Toolkit: "What [kind of post] is this, really?" 

A list of possibilities:

📰 News: Reports facts/events with sources

ℹ️ Informational: Offers tips/advice with varying credibility

👤 Personal story: Individual experience, not universal fact

🛒 Ad/Promotion: Sells products/ideas, not always labeled "Sponsored"

💭 Opinion: Personal viewpoint, may appear factual

🔊 Advocacy: Promotes social/political causes, often emotionally compelling

😂 Satire: Humor/provocation that might seem genuine

🖼️ Meme: Viral visual content with minimalcontext

With any given post, these categories can overlap, which is fine. Watch for when online creators blend stories, promotions, or opinions as facts to persuade.

When content seems unclear, asking "What is this?" restores critical perspective.

Critical thinking is the foundation for confident, resilient problem-solvers.

🧪 Real-world Example: Spotlight on TikTok

A creator shares: "I've been drinking lemon water on an empty stomach every morning, and I lost 2 inches off my waist in just one week! Try my method—it really works!"

So, "What is this really?":

📰 News? (No—lacks evidence, citations, or objective reporting.)

ℹ️ Informational? (Partly—presents itself as health advice, but without scientific backing.)

👤 Personal story? (Yes—shares individual experience and results.)

🛒 Ad/Promotion? (Yes—creator sells "detox guides" and promotes affiliate products.)

💭 Opinion? (Yes—expresses personal belief about effectiveness without acknowledging limitations.)

🔊 Advocacy? (No—not promoting a social or political cause.)

😂 Satire? (No—presented as genuine advice, not humor or parody.)

🖼️ Meme? (No—while shareable, it lacks the visual/cultural shorthand of a meme.)

To sum up, it is an opinion-based personal anecdote used as promotional content masquerading as informational advice.

🧠 BONUS!

Of course, a post like this provides other opportunities to flex our critical thinking muscles.

Let’s proceed with assumption that this creator did lose 2 inches off their waist. Do you see these 3 reasoning errors at play?

1. 🔄 Correlation ≠ Causation. Creator assumes lemon water caused weight loss when many factors are likely responsible (diet, exercise, water intake, etc).

2. 🔎 Hasty Generalization. One person's experience becomes a universal claim without sufficient evidence.

3. 👤 Anecdotal Evidence. Relies on a personal story instead of scientific research or controlled studies.

🔬Final scientific word: While lemon water may feel refreshing and improve hydration, there's no evidence it directly causes weight loss or targets belly fat.

📊 Research Insight: Yes, young folks need help…

A 2025 study in Computers in Human Behavior found that digital-native youngsters (ages 5-25) are indeed gullible online. Despite their confidence, they struggle to spot false information. The research shows that building those critical thinking muscles requires regular workouts, not just occasional "spot the fake news" pop quizzes. Think of it as digital literacy fitness—daily reps beat monthly gym visits every time 💪

📚 Reference: Computers in Human Behavior. (2025). False information among young people: A scoping review of responses, influences, consequences, and prevention.

🔖 Resource Worth Sharing

For those looking to level up their info literacy skills, I recommend "Verified: How to Think Straight, Get Duped Less, and Make Better Decisions About What to Believe Online" by Mike Caulfield and Sam Wineburg. This practical guide suggests asking "Do I know what I'm looking at?" as a critical step in evaluating online information.

🌊 Ready to dive in? 

Ask "What is this, really?" during your next social media session. Notice content that blurs lines between info, opinion, and promotion. What might be each creator's goal?

🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Connect & Share! 

Thanks for joining me on this journey!

If you have questions, stories, or suggestions for future topics, just hit reply—I’d love to hear from you.

Feel free to share this post with fellow educators, parents, or anyone committed to thinking well in a noisy world.

And if this ever stops being your thing, unsubscribe anytime—no hard feelings. 

To ThinkingWell together!

James