Decode Digital Noise with Credibility🚦

Asking "Who is this, really?" also goes a long way

Author

James Damico
August 13, 2025

🧠 There is no shortage of "experts" sharing advice online.

But who are these folks? And how might we respond to their posts?

Welcome back to ThinkWell Together—where we cut through the digital noise.

With this post let’s think through a “Who is this, really?” question with an actionable tip from the Twella Toolkit, an example, and another useful resource.

But first, we’ll get our bearings.

Let’s consider four factors about the creator (and/or sponsor!): accuracy/expertise, transparency/disclosure, commercial influence, and manipulation tactics. This context is crucial. 

đź“Š Accuracy & Expertise: Quality and reliability of info

  • Is content factually correct and evidence-based?

  • Does creator have relevant, verifiable expertise or qualifications?

  • Is content consistent and scientifically sound over time?

    Why important: This is non-negotiable foundation to ensure trustworthy info.

🔎 Transparency & Disclosure: Openness about identity and affiliations

  • Does creator clearly share credentials, affiliations, and sponsorships?

  • Are commercial relationships—such as paid partnerships, endorsements, or affiliate links—explicitly disclosed?

  • Does creator provide clear labeling that separates educational content from promotional material?

    Why important: Transparency helps users understand context and identify potential conflicts of interest.

đź’° Commercial Influence & Bias: Impact of financial incentives and content bias

  • Does creator have a monetary stake in follower count, product sales, or brand promotion?

  • Is there a pattern of content that prioritizes engagement or sales over factual education?

  • Are there signs of biased framing that favor sponsored products or services?

    Why important: Financial interests can shape content subtly or overtly. Recognizing this helps viewers critically analyze motives behind messaging.

🎭 Manipulation & Emotional Tactics: Use of psychological triggers to drive engagement

  • Does content use emotional or fear-mongering headlines?

  • Are oversimplified messages or “commonsense hooks” like self-evident advice or motivational phrases used to encourage clicks and shares?

  • Is content designed to trigger emotional reactions rather than thoughtful consideration?

    Why important: These techniques can lead to impulsive decisions rather than informed choices, even when underlying info has some validity.

Now we’re ready!

🧰 Twella Toolkit: Use Credibility 🚦  

đź”´ Weak Credibility

  • Frequent factual errors or misinfo; content is inconsistent and unreliable.

  • Lacks relevant expertise or qualifications; does not demonstrate consistent, trustworthy knowledge.

  • Little or no disclosure of credentials or commercial ties; promotional content often hidden.

  • Undisclosed financial motives bias content toward sales.

  • Uses fear-based or oversimplified messages to manipulate engagement.

🟡 Moderate Credibility

  • Mostly accurate with occasional minor errors; some relevant expertise.

  • Demonstrates reasonably consistent content.

  • Partial or inconsistent disclosure of affiliations and sponsorships; some promotions unlabeled.

  • Financial interests sometimes shape content.

  • Occasional use of emotional or catchy headlines.

🟢 Strong Credibility

  • Consistently accurate, evidence-based content from qualified experts or reliable communicators.

  • Demonstrates both expertise and steady, trustworthy content delivery over time.

  • Fully transparent about qualifications, sponsorships, and partnerships; clear separation of education and promotion.

  • Financial interests openly declared and balanced; minimal or acknowledged bias.

  • Minimal use of emotional tactics, oversimplified messages.

🧪 Practical Example—Spotlight on Instagram

You come across an Instagram post that reads: "Don’t microwave until you watch this.” The account holder is Dr. Vivian Chen with username plateful.health.

Let’s do some quick scanning across posts in this account.

Cred Check in 20 seconds Just a few quick moves to get smarter about who you follow.

đź“Š Accuracy & Expertise: Pop open @plateful.health and scroll a bit. Spot medical creds like "MBBS" or "MRCP" in the bio or posts?

🔎 Transparency & Disclosure: Peek at bio for business stuff—Plateful Health, LUMEBOX? Then check promo posts for "#ad," "#sponsored," or "Paid partnership" labels.

💰 Commercial Influence & Bias: Scroll through recent posts—how much is health advice, how much is product promos?

🎭 Manipulation & Emotional Tactics: Watch for posts like "Stop doing this!" or super obvious tips ("Drink water!"). Our brains fall for simple hooks, but emotional triggers should prompt critical thinking.

🔍 Pro tip: Instagram reveals limited info. For serious credibility checks, get away from Instagram and do quick web search on account holder. 🔎

Now let’s use the Credibility🚦 for plateful.health

đź“Š Accuracy & Expertise: STRONG 🟢
Qualified medical doctor with consistent, evidence-informed content balancing conventional and integrative medicine.

🔎 Transparency & Disclosure: STRONG 🟢
Clearly discloses credentials, business affiliations, sponsorships with labeling.

💰Commercial Influence & Bias: MODERATE 🟡
With 340K+ followers, Dr. Chen monetizes via product promotions and brand partnerships. Financial interests are declared but promotions create some commercial bias potential.

🎭 Manipulation & Emotional Tactics: MODERATE 🟡
Some posts use directives (”You should do this!”) or emotionally charged language to boost engagement.

Summary: Proceed with some caution!
While Dr. Chen has medical credentials and transparent disclosures, her influencer status and financial interests introduce commercial bias. Verify her advice with independent sources.

Critical thinking is the foundation for confident, resilient problem-solvers.

đź”– Resource Worth Sharing

Sooth.fyi is an internet search platform that helps students identify and [most importantly!] use reliable sources to do their own thinking and research. Sooth.fyi by draws on NewsGuard Reliability Ratings and AllSides Media Bias Ratings, offering critical guidance on the "Who is this, really?" question.

🌊 Ready to dive in? 

Challenge: Ask "Who is this, really?" during your next social media scrolling session. Take 20 seconds and use the credibility🚦for 3 creators that catch your attention. What do you notice? Which creators earn your trust?

🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Connect & Share! 

Thanks for joining me on this journey!

If you have questions, stories, or suggestions for future topics, just hit reply—I’d love to hear from you.

Feel free to share this post with fellow educators, parents, or anyone committed to thinking well in a noisy world.

And if this ever stops being your thing, unsubscribe anytime—no hard feelings. 

To ThinkingWell together!

James